MR.RAJESH’s Selective Amnesia—Dear Leader—by disguising MS.Kimi and Mr.Pual—shares Self-explanatory note that Uncovers WHAT AI needs to be TAUGHT !
I admire MR.RAJESH for his initiative to safeguard Authentic Human Connection /Communications from the Too-Much AI and emerging technologies.
On the subject I refer to Mr.Bruce Temkin’s Humanity At Scale episode on his talk with Heidi Lorenzen founder and executive producer of The Humanity Code: a documentary and global impact campaign focused on ensuring our highest human values don’t get lost as AI and other systems scale faster than our ability to reflect.
AI is accelerating faster than our governance models, leadership habits, and reflection cycles. Speed alone won’t save us. In this particular episode, Mr.Bruce unpacks:
🔹 Why “move fast” leadership breaks down in an AI-driven world
🔹 What leaders are responsible for before systems go autonomous
🔹 How stewardship reframes success beyond efficiency
🔍 Dozens of conversations. Five consistent leadership challenges.
Thank you for your kind comments - and for the pointer to Bruce Temkin's conversation with Heidi Lorenzen. I hadn't come across their work, but the five tensions they've identified are exactly what's playing out in real time.
I'd actually drafted this piece over two months ago but shelved it, thinking it might be too over-the-top. Then last week's news about Meta building an AI Zuck made me pull it back out. Suddenly Paul wasn't satire—he was just prescient.
What strikes me about the five challenges Bruce outlines—Speed vs. Deliberation, Automation vs. Judgment, Scale vs. Belonging, Authority vs. Participation, Performance vs. Well-Being—is that Paul's proposal violates all five simultaneously. He's automating judgment (the Kimi agent replacing actual CEO interaction), trading belonging for scale (metrics over connection), choosing performance tracking over employee well-being, and doing it all at speed without any deliberation about whether it's wise.
The irony is that Paul thinks he's being helpful. That's the scary part, the incentive systems are aligned for exactly this kind of thinking.
I see immense potential for AI to transform many things. But human connection isn't one of them. When we start mediating leadership through agents talking to agents, we've automated away the one thing that actually matters.
Will definitely explore Bruce's work further - this maps directly to several AI essays I'm developing. Thank you for the thoughtful addition.
MR.RAJESH’s Selective Amnesia—Dear Leader—by disguising MS.Kimi and Mr.Pual—shares Self-explanatory note that Uncovers WHAT AI needs to be TAUGHT !
I admire MR.RAJESH for his initiative to safeguard Authentic Human Connection /Communications from the Too-Much AI and emerging technologies.
On the subject I refer to Mr.Bruce Temkin’s Humanity At Scale episode on his talk with Heidi Lorenzen founder and executive producer of The Humanity Code: a documentary and global impact campaign focused on ensuring our highest human values don’t get lost as AI and other systems scale faster than our ability to reflect.
AI is accelerating faster than our governance models, leadership habits, and reflection cycles. Speed alone won’t save us. In this particular episode, Mr.Bruce unpacks:
🔹 Why “move fast” leadership breaks down in an AI-driven world
🔹 What leaders are responsible for before systems go autonomous
🔹 How stewardship reframes success beyond efficiency
🔍 Dozens of conversations. Five consistent leadership challenges.
🔹 Speed vs. Deliberation
🔹 Automation vs. Judgment
🔹 Scale vs. Belonging
🔹 Authority vs. Participation
🔹 Performance vs. Well-Being
MR.RAJESH—you’re EXCEPTIONAL !
Thank you for your kind comments - and for the pointer to Bruce Temkin's conversation with Heidi Lorenzen. I hadn't come across their work, but the five tensions they've identified are exactly what's playing out in real time.
I'd actually drafted this piece over two months ago but shelved it, thinking it might be too over-the-top. Then last week's news about Meta building an AI Zuck made me pull it back out. Suddenly Paul wasn't satire—he was just prescient.
What strikes me about the five challenges Bruce outlines—Speed vs. Deliberation, Automation vs. Judgment, Scale vs. Belonging, Authority vs. Participation, Performance vs. Well-Being—is that Paul's proposal violates all five simultaneously. He's automating judgment (the Kimi agent replacing actual CEO interaction), trading belonging for scale (metrics over connection), choosing performance tracking over employee well-being, and doing it all at speed without any deliberation about whether it's wise.
The irony is that Paul thinks he's being helpful. That's the scary part, the incentive systems are aligned for exactly this kind of thinking.
I see immense potential for AI to transform many things. But human connection isn't one of them. When we start mediating leadership through agents talking to agents, we've automated away the one thing that actually matters.
Will definitely explore Bruce's work further - this maps directly to several AI essays I'm developing. Thank you for the thoughtful addition.